Wednesday 21 October 2020

NEW RESEARCH RESEARCH STUDY SHOWS INEFFECTIVENESS OF MAMMOGRAMS:

As a physician and a female with fibrocystic breast illness, it actually troubles me when I hear X-Ray Mammography misrepresented as preventive medicine. X-Rays are never, form or form prevention. X-Ray Mammography goes to finest a form of very early discovery of bust cancer, but it can just locate a lump after it has grown to a considerable dimension. Even after that, X-Ray Mammography misses 50 percent of the growths in women, who have dense busts. Since over 50% of premenopausal women as well as 25 percent of postmenopausal ladies have thick busts, a big variety of females are at threat of misdiagnosis by depending entirely on X-Ray Mammography. This is specifically real for women with fibrocystic bust condition-- or for females with scar tissue in their breasts.I am directlyextremely concerned concerning discovering bust condition due to my family members history-- my sibling died of breast cancer when she was 41. That's why I began getting Infrared Mammograms years earlier. Unlike X-Rays, Infrared Mammography does not call for contact with your breasts or direct exposure to hazardous radiation. While X-Ray Mammograms are photos of the breast anatomy, Infrared Mammograms are photos of your breast metabolism, to ensure that also pre-cancerous swelling or microscopic tumors can be identified, because they generate additional heat due to enhanced blood circulation.

Breast Screening


No comments:

Post a Comment